The context of the Hebrew language used in Genesis 1 assures us that God created everything in six literal 24-hour days. The history of the genealogies recorded in Genesis 5 and 11 provide an accurate chronology showing that since the earth was created five days before Adam, the earth is only about 6,000 years old.
In addition, there is abundant scientific evidence that supports the six day creation world-view rather than the millions of years (from goo to you by way of the zoo) evolutionary world-view.
Why, then, do so many still insist that the earth and universe must be very old because they “look old”? Why, they ask, do they “look old” if they’re not old?
Well, in the beginning God did not use some form of “Theistic Evolution” in His creation plan. He would not have stirred up some pool of “primordial soup”, or just scattered some seeds or eggs then wait for something to develop and see if it (they) would survive.
The very first thing He did was to create ex nihilo (out of nothing) all the elements comprising the earth, universe, and all that is in them. Along with created matter, God created space and time as we know it (what scientists call the space – time – matter continuum). Then God spoke (created by Fiat) all the things recorded in Genesis 1:3-27.
By the end of the creation week, the heavens and the earth had to be a fully functioning entity - - complete, mature, and fully functional from the start.
When God formed the land by His hands (Day 3), the soil had to be mature - - containing all the elements necessary for plant growth. Trees were created as fully-grown mature trees. Fish, birds and land animals were created mature and ready to “multiply after their kind”. Finally, Adam and Eve, for whom everything had been made, were created as full-grown mature individuals - - capable of multiplying to fill the earth. (They probably didn’t have belly-buttons, though - - because they were not born of a woman as were all who came after them).
This complete and mature status is often referred to as creation “with an appearance of age”. Does this mean that God has fooled us with some sort of “divine deception”, making things look older than they are? Certainly not! Consider this - - We wouldn’t accuse Jesus of “deceiving” the ruler of the feast when He changed water into wine would we? Jesus’ first miracle was a miracle of creation. The “best wine” (John 2:10) was a brand new creation, with no time for aging or fermentation - - it was created fully aged and mature because it involved a sudden supernatural creation of a complex entity apart from “natural processes”.
Well, it’s that time of year again. Thousands of angers will soon be headed for the nearby lakes, streams, ponds and Owens River, armed with their best sure-fire ammunition - - flies, lures, or a variety of bait (eggs, cheese, power bait, etc.) Of course, many will learn from the guy catching the most fish, that they are really biting on the only thing you didn’t bring!
And then there are those of us who still try fishing the old-fashioned way - - by drowning worms. But did you every think of that humble earthworm on your hook as being a magnificent example of God’s creative handiwork?
Earthworms are actually highly specialized creatures. They are deaf and have no eyes - - but they can detect light, as well as vibrations. A worm cut in half will usually not survive, but if the tail is severed near the end a new tail can form.
Earthworms are obviously designed for their important task of burrowing through soil - - making a most important contribution to the fertilization, aeration, and drainage of the soil. In some orchard areas, it is estimated that 90 percent of the leaves that fall from the trees are dragged into the ground by earthworms. They also swallow large amounts of soil, digest the nutrients, then cast up the remains onto the surface of the ground or in their burrows. This is how they work their continuing system of plowing, which enriches and oxygenates the soil.
It is said that an average acre of land can house up to three million earthworms, most of which are found in the top five or six inches. And, they can move about 18 tons of soil per year.
The question is, however, can evolution explain the earthworm’s ability to loosen, stir up or plow, and aerate the soil to make it more fertile? Could this ability have come about through the supposedly evolutionary processes of mutations and “natural selection”? Did the earthworm choose to do this digging throughout its life, to pass countless tons of soil through its body over the centuries to help cultivate the soil for the benefit of plant life?
A far better explanation is that the Creator designed and planned the earthworm in the beginning, to be a willing, if humble, servant of the plant world. Therefore, by doing the work that God designed it to do, the earthworm helps sustain the balance of all other life on this earth.
The question is often asked: Why four Gospels? - - Why not one or two? Or even five or six? Consider the following (taken from The Chuck Missler Update, Nov. 2001):
The words of each Gospel were given, of course, by inspiration of the Holy Spirit. However, they were given in a way that would be best understood by each writer - - from his perspective, according to his background. Therefore, each Gospel presents Jesus from a different point of reference.
MATTHEW: A Levite and Tax Collector - - writing to the Jew.
– emphasizes Jesus as Messiah; the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies.
– gives Jesus’ genealogy from Abraham through David to Joseph.
– concludes with the Resurrection.
– focuses on What Jesus Said (as an official, Matthew probably able to record words nearly verbatim).
– records first miracle as the cleansing of the leper (a Jewish metaphor for sin).
MARK: Served as a secretary for Peter - - writing to the Roman. – emphasizes Jesus as the Obedient Servant of God.
– the only Gospel not concerned with Jesus’ genealogy.
– concludes with the Ascension.
– focuses on What Jesus Did.
– records first miracle as casting unclean spirit out of man at synagogue.
LUKE: A Gentile and a doctor - - writing to the Greek.
– emphasizes Jesus as Son Of Man (His humanity).
– gives Jesus’ genealogy from Adam through Abraham to David same as Matthew, but Luke does not go through Solomon - - instead goes through Nathan, to Mary.
– concludes with the promise of the Holy Spirit (A bridge to the Book of Acts).
– focuses on What Jesus Felt.
– records first miracle same as Mark (casting out an unclean spirit).
JOHN: Writing to the Church.
– emphasizes Jesus as the Son Of God.
– gives Jesus’ genealogy as the “Preexistent One”.
– concludes with Jesus’ promise to come again (a bridge to the Book of Revelation).
– focuses on Who Jesus Was.
– records first miracle as the changing water into wine. (also records 7 miracles, 7 discourses, and 7 “I AM” statements).
It probably goes without saying, but the fact is - - the Christian life hinges on the reality of the resurrection of Jesus. If the resurrection is not a fact, then, as the Apostle Paul said; “our preaching is in vain and your faith is also in vain” (1 Corinthians 15:14). “Vain” means, of course; empty, powerless, and of no effect.
But Jesus did rise from the dead, and as a fact of history, He appeared to hundreds of people in the 40 days following the crucifixion - - even to 500 at one time (1 Cor., Chapter 15). Jesus also appeared to John on the Isle of Patmos and proclaimed: “I am He that liveth, and was dead: and behold, I am alive forevermore, Amen, and have the keys of hell and of death” (Revelation 1:18 KJV).
Jesus’ death and resurrection, in a manner of speaking, “undid” what Adam’s sin did back in the Garden of Eden. Adam’s sin had caused separation from God. Jesus’ death and resurrection paid the penalty for sin (in full - - once and for all) and opened the door to fellowship with God.
Jesus’ suffering entailed more than being nailed to the cross. Around 700 B.C. the prophet Isaiah made known the purpose of the cross of the coming Messiah. “Surely He has borne our griefs, And carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed Him stricken, Smitten by God and afflicted. He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement for our peace was upon Him, and by His stripes we are healed” (Isaiah 53:4,5).
Those words “sorrows” and “griefs” also mean “infirmities” and “sicknesses” (Matthew 8:17). Jesus’ sacrifice covered every area of man’s existence. Suffering in our place and being separated from the Father, Jesus suffered spiritual torment, mental distress and physical pain.
But Praise God! - - as a result, Jesus defeated Satan and gained victory over death, hell, and the grave. Then, when Divine justice was satisfied, God raised Him from the dead and He ascended into heaven - - where He is now seated at God’s right hand, making intercession for us.
Christ’s resurrection, then, was the final evidence that He had paid the price for our redemption - - that His sacrifice for us was accepted by God the Father, and that we could have eternal life and be forever reconciled to God as a result.
Because Jesus took on human form and became obedient unto death on a cross, and rose from the dead, we can have the free gift of eternal life with Him. But remember, a gift is only a gift if it is accepted. He gave all that He had so that we might have everything we need.
This is the Blessed Hope we have through our Risen Lord!
It is recorded in Mark 10:6 (and similarly in Matthew 19:4) that Jesus, when being questioned by the Pharisees regarding marriage and divorce, began His answer with “But from the beginning of the creation God made them (Adam and Eve) male and female”. Jesus was referring to the words in Genesis 1:27.
Here Jesus is stating as fact that Adam and Eve were created “in the beginning” - - not some 4 billion years after the beginning. This also confirms that God had prepared a world for them shortly beforehand - - that is, over the five previous days. Furthermore, the expression “beginning of the creation” rules out some second attempt or change of plans, which proponents of the ruin/reconstruction (or Gap) theory suggest.
What are the implications of an early and special creation of the human race? Because we were made “in the image of God” (that is, as spiritual beings) we can have fellowship with our Creator, through our acceptance of His offer of forgiveness in Jesus, and repenting of our sins. Of course, it goes without saying that “repent” doesn’t mean just saying “sorry about that” - - but it is a decision that results in a change of mind, which in turn leads to a change in purpose and action.
The Bible teaches throughout that of all the creatures, we alone can have that personal relationship with our Creator. Therefore, it would have no logical purpose for Him to ordain millions, or billions, of years with only rocks, algae, fish, reptiles, or even mammals, with whom He could have no spiritual communication.
God created us “for Himself”. If we were created after billions of years of other creative activity, this would send a strong message to us that mankind is really nothing special, and certainly not the focus of His intentions and love. The more we look at the speed with which He brought us into existence, the more it suggests that His original intention was to bring into being the human race, which He could love and nurture.
I know there are some who ask “Couldn’t God have used some slower evolutionary process to create everything?” Well, it’s not a question of what He “could have done” - - It’s what HE SAID HE DID!
The question is often asked: “Do creationists blame evolution for all the evils in society?” Well. The answer is actually “Yes and no”. We have to say “no” because it is not primarily evolution that is to blame, but it is the rejection of God as Creator. If society rejects God, they also reject God’s rules and abandon Christian ethics in favor of belief in their own opinions. On the other hand, we must say “yes” because belief in so-called “scientific” evolution is usually the justification for rejecting God as Creator.
In his book “The Lie : Evolution”, author Ken Ham presented a cartoon-like illustration that really describes an important problem. Picture This:
There are two castles that are at war with each other. On the left, the castle called “Humanism” is built on the foundation of evolution and above the castle are several balloons, labeled abortion, pornography, divorce, racism, etc. On the right is a castle called “Christianity”, built on its foundation of creation.
In the ongoing battle, the foundation of creation is shaking and is beginning to crack; because the humanists know exactly where to aim their big guns - - at the foundation only.
The Christians want to fight the war but they don’t seem to know where to aim their cannons. Some are taking potshots at the issues above the castle, others are aiming nowhere in particular, and some are actually shooting at each other - - but none are aimed at the foundation of evolution.
Psalm 11:3 says “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do ?”. If the foundation of anything is destroyed, the structure built upon that foundation will collapse. Is it any wonder that Satan is attacking Genesis more than any other book of the Bible ? If the church wants to be successful in changing society’s attitude toward abortion, pornography, divorce, racism; it’s going to have to fight at a foundational level - - and the foundation of creation must be restored to its rightful place of importance.
2 Peter 3:3-7 presents a perfect picture of what has been, and most obviously is today, happening in our world. It tells us that not only in these last days scoffers will come, but that men will be “Willingly ignorant of the truth” - - that is, they will deliberately reject the truth of God’s Word, no matter what the supporting evidence might be.
Specifically, these four verses say that men will “willingly” reject three things: (1) That at the very beginning the earth was covered with water, and the land was formed out of the water - - as described in Genesis. (modern geology insists that the earth was originally a molten blob and that water didn’t form until the earth had cooled over millions of years); (2) That the earth was completely covered by water during Noah’s Flood. (Again, most geologists, and even many in the Church, deny the fact of a world-wide Flood suggesting it instead could have been just a local event); and (3) That there will be a coming judgement by fire. (Many actually accept the idea that the earth and all life on it will eventually die of extreme cold, after the sun burns out).
But why do so many adamantly dispute the Bible’s description of these events? Well, consider this - - if the scoffers, or skeptics, accepted the evidence of a world-wide flood, they would be agreeing with the Bible. Then they would have to accept Jesus’ teaching that as the Creator once judged the world by water, so He will again judge the corrupt world - - but the next time it will be by fire.
It seems evident that the creation/evolution controversy is not really a fight about evidence (although all historical, archaeological, and scientific evidence definitely supports the Genesis account), but it is a fight over beliefs, or world-views.
The fundamental conflict we see in society today is the clash between the Christian faith with its creation foundation, hence its absolutes, and the religion of humanism with its evolution foundation and its relative morality that says we must be tolerant of all beliefs, behavior and practices. Of course the fallacy of the humanistic belief in so-called “tolerance” is first made evident by a zealous “intolerance” of absolutes.
It would follow, then, that someone who is intolerant of absolutes is also intolerant of Christ. Remember, Jesus said “I am THE WAY” (not one of many ways); “THE TRUTH” (not one of several different but equally acceptable approaches to the truth); and “THE LIFE” (John 14:6).
Hopefully, the more the Biblical Creation message is preached, people will come to realize that it gives us the understanding of what is happening to our society and the world - - and why there is increasing lawlessness and deviant behavior. But while creationists fervently proclaim the creation message to strengthen a firm foundation of Christian faith, and shine the light on the real differences between two opposing belief systems, we also know that our primary purpose is to glorify God and to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ - - as the Holy Spirit enables.
It’s been almost 50 years since Dr. Francis Crick (the co-discoverer of the double-helix structure of DNA) admitted that he had to recognize the impossibility of life arising on Earth by chance natural processes. But, since the only other explanation was Special Creation as documented in Genesis, he proposed the idea of “Directed Panspermia."
That new proposal suggested that life, in the form of bacteria spores, arose “by chance” on some other planet and was sent to Earth possibly by intelligent beings from “somewhere” in the universe. Crick surmised that such spores must have been like those of Bacillus subtilus, or similar bacteria, because of their extreme resistance to damage from radiation or desiccation.
A fellow researcher went even further, suggesting that if an extra-terrestrial civilization was responsible, they must have encoded some kind of message on the DNA of such an organism. If it were only possible, they thought, to decode this sequence of DNA, we could learn the secrets of the universe.
As was described in the Nov. 20, 1997 issue of Nature, the DNA of the bacteria Bacillus subtilis had been decoded. Some 151 scientists collaborated in this undertaking, but none discovered any “messages from space." They did, however, find much more than had been expected in the form of complex genetic information - - more than four million “letters” of the genetic code, equivalent to more than 1,000 typewritten pages.
This research, then, did not establish any extra-terrestrial connection, but did show us that even the “simplest” living cell is not so “simple”, and could not have arisen by chance; not even “out there, somewhere."
Speaking of supposed extra-terrestrial “life”, remember the highly-touted “Mars Rock” found in Antarctica, some 20 plus years ago? That rock, alleged to be the “proof” that a form of microscopic life came here from the red planet, was front-page news for a couple of years - - until one-by-one scientists recognized that the rock was not what it was reported to be.
Soon, very few, if any, scientists could agree that the rock could have even come from Mars - - let alone that a comet impact could have sent the rock into space, overcoming Mars’ gravitational pull; or that there was no contamination in the supposed 13,000 years the rock sat in Antarctica.
The Bible does not say whether or not life is found elsewhere in the universe. However, if, as the Genesis account of creation clearly says, the Earth was created first, and then the sun, moon and stars - - it seems reasonable that the Earth was center stage in the Creation, and everything else was prepared for the humans that would inhabit it.
“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1). As we can see from this very first verse of the Bible, God created the earth “at the beginning”. This certainly can’t be construed, in any sense, to be an evolutionary statement.
The evolution world-view, however, demands that we believe that the earth didn’t appear at the beginning at all - - but instead, that it came into existence more than half-way down the track of time. The theory of evolution proposes that the universe has existed for billions of years, with a slow emergence of stars - - until our sun appeared.
The next hypothesized event in the alleged evolutionary progression is that a molten blob shot out from the sun, and after millions of years cooled down enough to become a habitable planet. Then the long story of evolution began. But, by this time we are already billions of years beyond the beginning!
Genesis, on the other hand, doesn’t say anything about a molten-hot earth, or a frozen one. Instead, it describes a cool, water-covered earth, ready for God to form the “solid stuff”, right at the start. By the first day (evening and morning) God had created time and what we call “matter” - - not to mention energy in the form of light.
The message of Genesis chapter 1 is clear - - God made the earth at the beginning - - even before some of the “solid parts” of the universe (Genesis 1:14-16). Be assured, God knew what He was doing, and He knew that it would be unreasonable to create things one by one over billions of years - - things which would depend on each other for survival.
Some seem to overlook the fact that many things on earth and in space “interlock together”. In living things, this connection is known as symbiosis - - but even in non-living matter, several of the “bits” can’t exist without other “bits”.
There was indeed a beginning. Not the beginning of God, but the beginning of time and of this world. The universe was no accident, although evolution and some Eastern religions suggest so. Even some who believe in God, and believe He was there in the beginning, attempt to fit Him into an evolutionary framework of millions or billions of years. Such a view, however, cannot be reconciled with the truth of Genesis.
Speaking as a wildlife biologist (retired) - - When we look at God’s creation (especially the various species of wildlife), we are “without excuse” (Romans 1:20) if we choose to deny that the genetic code in each created kind was programmed by their Creator complete, fully developed and functioning, right from the beginning.
Dr. Michael Behe, Professor of Biochemistry at Lehigh University (and not a supporter of creationism), has pointed out in his book Darwin’s Black Box that there are certain biochemical systems “so complex as to provide what appears to be an insurmountable problem for evolution”.
To see excellent examples of complex biochemical systems, we need to look no further than our own bodies - - the extremely complex pinnacle of God’s creation.
Take blood clotting for example. When we get a cut, we bleed - - until a blood clot forms to stop the bleeding (hopefully within seconds!). Blood clotting is a multi-step process involving numerous enzymes and proteins. If any one of the proteins were missing, the blood would not clot - - and, simply put, each protein depends upon an enzyme to activate it.
We all have heard the old question; “which came first, the chicken or the egg?” The answer is, of course, the chicken - - created fully mature and ready to lay an egg. But when considering the biochemical activity present in blood clotting, some might be tempted to ask; “which came first, the protein or the enzyme?”
Well, it couldn’t be the protein because the protein can’t function without the enzyme to “turn it on”. But then, why would nature “evolve” an activating enzyme before there was anything to activate?
Furthermore, if blood clotting had evolved step-by-step over any extended period of time, creatures would have bled to death long before it was perfected.
No biochemical system, especially as seen in the example of blood clotting, could be the result of some random evolutionary process. Such systems require every component to be working to be functional. If any one component were missing, it would be non-functional.
Therefore, logic and scientific data would tell us that the Genesis account of origins is the only true and acceptable explanation. God created all things mature and fully-functional - - in the beginning!
It’s been said before, but it deserves repeating, the truth of the entire Bible stands or falls with the historicity of Genesis. Ironically, the secular world recognizes this more than many in the church.
In fact, Thomas Huxley, one of the 19th century’s most ardent proponents of the theory of evolution, chided Christians in his essay on “Science and the Hebrew Tradition” when he wrote: “I am fairly at a loss to comprehend how anyone for a moment can doubt that Christian theology must stand or fall with the historical trustworthiness of the Jewish Scriptures. The identification of Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah rests upon the interpretation of the passages of Hebrew Scriptures, which have no evidential value unless they possess the historical character assigned to them”.
Some in the church today hold the view that the first eleven chapters of Genesis are merely allegorical and poetic expressions which are open to various interpretations - - even allowing for evolution as an explanation for the origin of the universe and man.
But, as a child once remarked “If God didn’t mean what He said, why didn’t He say what He meant?” Well, the good news is - - He did say what He meant!
We are not dealing with poetry in Genesis 1 through 11, but the blow by blow account of a series of major events which are entirely accurate and vital to the acceptance of the rest of Scripture, and of Jesus Christ as Creator, Savior and Lord.
So, why should we take Genesis 1 – 11 as literal history? First, and foremost, Jesus regarded the major characters and events as true history. He referred to Adam and Eve indirectly in Matthew 19:4; to Abel directly in Matthew 23:35 and Luke 11:51; and to Noah and the Flood directly in Matthew 24:37-39 and Luke 17:26-27.
The genealogy of Christ in Luke chapter 3 supports the genealogies of Genesis 5 and11, and also that of 1 Chronicles 1. Repetition like this should support the view that the genealogies represent an accurate history of the ancestry of man.
Also, the Apostles regarded the major characters and events of Genesis 1 – 11 as accurate history as well. Paul refers to Adam and Eve as real persons in Romans 5:14; 1 Cor.15:32, 35; 2 Cor. 11:3 and 1 Timothy 2:13, 14. If Genesis is not true history, then 1 Timothy 2 becomes nonsense.
Hebrews 11:4 and 12:24 refer to Cain and Abel as historical, and both John and Jude confirm this in John 3:12 and Jude 11. Jude 14 also speaks of the genealogy from Adam to Enoch as true history - - saying Enoch was “the seventh from Adam”.
Then, Peter refers to Noah historically in both Epistles (1 Peter 3:20 and 2 Peter 2:5). Peter also considered the Flood as a true historical event in 1 Peter 2:5 and especially in 2 Peter 3:4-7.
It’s probably safe to say that Christians believe without question that the words of Jesus and the Apostles are inspired and true. Then, from just these few examples we must conclude that the New Testament leaves no doubt that Adam and Eve were indeed historical, with their ensuing fall; that the genealogy from Adam to Noah is historical; and that the Flood was a worldwide historical event - - just as Genesis records.
When we think we’ve got problems confronting us - - consider the problems that Moses and the Israelites faced in their Exodus from Egypt. We received an e-mail a while back that described the Exodus something like this:
Moses led some 2 to 3 million people into the wilderness - - but what was he going to do with them? They were going to require a lot of food and supplies.
According to a former Army Quartermaster General, they would need about 1,500 tons of food each day. To bring that much food each day, two freight trains at least a mile long would be required (try to convert that to camels or donkeys if you wish).
Then, it should be remembered that they were in a desert, so firewood would be needed for cooking. This would take about 4,000 tons of wood and a few more freight trains (caravans), each a mile long, for just one day.
And don’t forget about water! A minimum of about 11 million gallons would be needed each day - - and a train of tank cars, hundreds of miles long, to deliver it.
Of course, we also know that a unique problem arose shortly after the people headed east - - they had to cross the Red Sea (actually a branch of the Red Sea known as the Gulf of Aqaba). If they went on a narrow path, double file, the line would be about 800 miles long and would require 35 days and nights to get through. So, there had to be a space about 3 miles wide to walk on so they could walk 5,000 abreast to get across in one night.
SIDE NOTE: skeptics usually attempt to downplay this miracle by saying that they crossed the edge of a “Red Sea” - - where the water was only a few inches deep. Well, even if this were true, it would be a great miracle to see the Egyptian Army, many on chariots, drown along with the horses and foot soldiers, in just a few inches of water!
Anyway, back to the facts - - where another problem arose. Each time they camped at the end of the day, a campsite two-thirds the size of Rhode Island was required.
Do you think Moses had this all figured out before he left Egypt? Probably not. Moses believed in God and trusted Him to take care of these things - - AND HE DID!
Some of the problems we face might seem insurmountable to us, but they pale in significance when compared to the Exodus - - so would God have any problem taking care of all our needs? No, nothing is too difficult for Him.
So when trials and troubles come our way (and they will) we can be confident that His promises are true and He will see us through. We are His special creation and He is our awesome God - - and He will work on our behalf, if we just trust and obey, humble ourselves and pray, and seek His face (2 Chronicles 7:14).
Racially motivated hate crimes seem to be making headlines far too often these days. But one point should be made clear, so there can be no misunderstanding - - the concept of “race” is not Biblical! There is no mention of races, as such, in Scripture - - nor is there any theological meaning to the term.
Therefore, it must be concluded that races are arbitrary entities invented by man for his own convenience and anthropological studies. Actually, as Dr. Henry M. Morris once wrote, the term “race” is strictly an evolutionary concept used by Darwin, Huxley, and others in the 19th century “to rationalize their white racism”.
So, then, what does the Bible say? The testimony of the Bible is that all men who have ever lived are descendants of Adam and are of essentially the same race - - the human race. While the Bible does not mention races, it does have a lot to say about nations and languages. “And God has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth…” (Acts 17:36). This distinction of “nations” is even in heaven, as Revelation 7:9 gives the vision of “a great multitude which no one could number; of all nations, tribes, peoples, and tongues …”.
After the “confounding of their language” at the tower of Babel, and the dispersion of people away from the area of Mesopotamia, miraculous physiological changes must have occurred in the centers of the peoples brains that control speech. The resulting confusion and incoherent arguments finally led each family to go its own way and establish its own national and linguistic identity.
A certain amount of isolation and national inbreeding was genetically essential for the development of national “traits”. National characteristics would have developed rapidly, because different innate genetic factors for skin color, stature, hair texture, etc., were originally created in Adam and Eve to permit development of different family characteristics as the human race would multiply and fill the earth (Gen.1:28; 9:1). These characteristics, however, are superficial and could never result in a new “kind” of man.
The bottom line is, all “nations” are alike before God in that they all need a Savior, and in that all can come to the Savior, Jesus Christ, if they will. (see Galatians 3:26-29; and, of course, John 3:16).
IT’S A FACT---HE IS RISEN!
“...Jesus Christ, who being in the form of God coming in the likeness of man, And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death on the cross” (Philippians 2:5-8).
But praise God, He rose again just as He said He would (Mark 9:9, John 2:19) - - and ascended to the right hand of the Father where He ever makes intercession for us (Ephesians 1:20, Romans 8:24).
Now there are many who do not believe the historical eyewitness accounts that Jesus really died and rose again, and they have devised many stories in an attempt to explain away the Empty Tomb.
Some have suggested that the disciples stole Jesus’ body and then lied, saying that He rose from the dead. But - - the disciples couldn’t have even made it to the tomb without being noticed by the Roman guards. Then there’s the fact that most of the disciples died for their belief that Jesus rose from the dead. They would not have died for something they knew to be a lie!
Others say that the story of the resurrection is just a myth or a legend. But the Gospels were written between 25 and 65 years after the event - - hardly enough time for a legend or myth to develop. Some of the eyewitnesses to the event were still around to answer any questions.
Some critics say the Jesus simply fainted on the cross (the so-called “Swoon Theory”) and then revived in the cool tomb and got up and left. But - - Jesus would have had to somehow unwrap Himself from the grave clothes, push aside the large stone (which was so heavy that it took several men to place it there), and then walk past the Roman guards outside. Could an almost-dead-by-crucifixion man have the strength to do this? Also, a Roman soldier had pierced Jesus’ side with a spear while He was still on the cross, and the blood and water that flowed from the wound showed that He was truly dead.
Still others have said that the Roman soldiers or other Jews removed Jesus’ body from the tomb. But those people had no reason to do that - - instead, they would have wanted to keep the body in the tomb to stop any stories that Jesus had actually risen. If the disciples would say He had been seen alive, the soldiers could easily prove the story false by producing the body.
Yes, Jesus did die a terrible death on the cross, for you and for me - - but Jesus, the creator of all things, was not defeated by death. He rose again in three days, showing that He had power overall things including death, hell, and the grave. The bodily resurrection of our Savior and Lord Jesus from the dead is the crowning proof of Christianity - - the final evidence that He paid the price for our redemption and that His sacrifice, that covered every area of man’s existence, was wholly accepted by God the Father.
Back in the 1980’s, when the term “politically correct” became popular, it soon became obvious, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that any professing Christian - - and especially a creationist - - was quite “politically incorrect”.
Many had hoped that this trend would be rejected by the so-called “open-minded” advocates of academic freedom. Wrong! Almost overnight, political correctness was accepted and defended by many leaders in academics, politics, the media, and yes, even by some church leaders.
Today, many thought systems are labeled “politically incorrect”. But why does belief in the Genesis account of creation and the Flood seem to be at the top of the list? There are probably many reasons, but the primary reason is that evolution is the foundation for most thought systems now deemed “correct” - - from humanism, to new age, to post-modernism (a term I don’t even pretend to understand).
But evolution can’t stand the test of open scientific inquiry. Therefore, the Biblical account of special creation and a world-wide Flood must be ridiculed - - even censored. It follows then, that in the name of “tolerance”, the PC crowd belittles and maligns any person or thought that is not, in their view, “tolerant” - - that is, which does not value every viewpoint or action as being equally valid.
Christianity, through its foundational message of Special Creation, insists that absolute truth does exist, in faith and practice as well as science and history. The intolerant “Politically Correct” movement against the truth of God’s Word seems to gather momentum each year, especially in the schools and universities - - and unprepared Christian students often fall prey to the concepts of the evolutionary world-view.
If standing for what God is for, and against what God is against, is considered by some as being “intolerant” - - intolerant of those views and actions that exalt the words and thoughts of fallible man over those of the Creator God - - so be it!
Actually, I hate to say it, but we could be called something even beyond “intolerant” or “politically incorrect” About 20 years ago a survey conducted in the UK showed that only 26 % of those surveyed expressed belief in the God of the Bible. Even among the 103 British church Bishops surveyed, 25 percent no longer believe in the virgin birth and a few admitted they didn’t believe that Jesus rose from the dead.
After reviewing the survey results, a University of Aberdeen sociology professor concluded that “Britain is now a post-Christian society”, and Christians are “a Deviant Minority”. Just being politically incorrect doesn’t sound so bad.