2 Peter 3:3-7 presents a perfect picture of what has been, and most obviously is today, happening in our world. It tells us that not only in these last days scoffers will come, but that men will be “Willingly ignorant of the truth” - - that is, they will deliberately reject the truth of God’s Word, no matter what the supporting evidence might be.

Specifically, these four verses say that men will “willingly” reject three things: (1) That at the very beginning the earth was covered with water, and the land was formed out of the water - - as described in Genesis. (modern geology insists that the earth was originally a molten blob and that water didn’t form until the earth had cooled over millions of years); (2) That the earth was completely covered by water during Noah’s Flood. (Again, most geologists, and even many in the Church, deny the fact of a world-wide Flood suggesting it instead could have been just a local event); and (3) That there will be a coming judgement by fire. (Many actually accept the idea that the earth and all life on it will eventually die of extreme cold, after the sun burns out).

But why do so many adamantly dispute the Bible’s description of these events? Well, consider this - - if the scoffers, or skeptics, accepted the evidence of a world-wide flood, they would be agreeing with the Bible. Then they would have to accept Jesus’ teaching that as the Creator once judged the world by water, so He will again judge the corrupt world - - but the next time it will be by fire.

It seems evident that the creation/evolution controversy is not really a fight about evidence (although all historical, archaeological, and scientific evidence definitely supports the Genesis account), but it is a fight over beliefs, or world-views.

The fundamental conflict we see in society today is the clash between the Christian faith with its creation foundation, hence its absolutes, and the religion of humanism with its evolution foundation and its relative morality that says we must be tolerant of all beliefs, behavior and practices. Of course the fallacy of the humanistic belief in so-called “tolerance” is first made evident by a zealous “intolerance” of absolutes.

It would follow, then, that someone who is intolerant of absolutes is also intolerant of Christ. Remember, Jesus said “I am THE WAY” (not one of many ways); “THE TRUTH” (not one of several different but equally acceptable approaches to the truth); and “THE LIFE” (John 14:6).

Hopefully, the more the Biblical Creation message is preached, people will come to realize that it gives us the understanding of what is happening to our society and the world - - and why there is increasing lawlessness and deviant behavior. But while creationists fervently proclaim the creation message to strengthen a firm foundation of Christian faith, and shine the light on the real differences between two opposing belief systems, we also know that our primary purpose is to glorify God and to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ - - as the Holy Spirit enables.


It’s been almost 50 years since Dr. Francis Crick (the co-discoverer of the double-helix structure of DNA) admitted that he had to recognize the impossibility of life arising on Earth by chance natural processes. But, since the only other explanation was Special Creation as documented in Genesis, he proposed the idea of “Directed Panspermia."

That new proposal suggested that life, in the form of bacteria spores, arose “by chance” on some other planet and was sent to Earth possibly by intelligent beings from “somewhere” in the universe. Crick surmised that such spores must have been like those of Bacillus subtilus, or similar bacteria, because of their extreme resistance to damage from radiation or desiccation.

A fellow researcher went even further, suggesting that if an extra-terrestrial civilization was responsible, they must have encoded some kind of message on the DNA of such an organism. If it were only possible, they thought, to decode this sequence of DNA, we could learn the secrets of the universe.

As was described in the Nov. 20, 1997 issue of Nature, the DNA of the bacteria Bacillus subtilis had been decoded. Some 151 scientists collaborated in this undertaking, but none discovered any “messages from space."  They did, however, find much more than had been expected in the form of complex genetic information - - more than four million “letters” of the genetic code, equivalent to more than 1,000 typewritten pages.

This research, then, did not establish any extra-terrestrial connection, but did show us that even the “simplest” living cell is not so “simple”, and could not have arisen by chance; not even “out there, somewhere."

Speaking of supposed extra-terrestrial “life”, remember the highly-touted “Mars Rock” found in Antarctica, some 20 plus years ago? That rock, alleged to be the “proof” that a form of microscopic life came here from the red planet, was front-page news for a couple of years - - until one-by-one scientists recognized that the rock was not what it was reported to be.

Soon, very few, if any, scientists could agree that the rock could have even come from Mars - - let alone that a comet impact could have sent the rock into space, overcoming Mars’ gravitational pull; or that there was no contamination in the supposed 13,000 years the rock sat in Antarctica.

The Bible does not say whether or not life is found elsewhere in the universe. However, if, as the Genesis account of creation clearly says, the Earth was created first, and then the sun, moon and stars - - it seems reasonable that the Earth was center stage in the Creation, and everything else was prepared for the humans that would inhabit it.

the king of creation


    The Bible has much to say about the reigns of the many kings throughout the early history of the Middle East.  But Scripture also contains many references to God as King.  For example: In Malachi 1:14 God says “For I am a great King”,and Jeremiah 10:10 calls Him “the everlastingKing”.  A few of the references to God as King stand out as especially significant - - as noted by the author of a 1980 publication, “King of Creation”:

1.  He is the King of Time: because He created time (Psalm 74:12).

2.  He is the King of Space: because He created infinite space (Daniel 4:37 & Nehemiah 9:6).

3.  He is the King of Matter: because He made all things in Space & Time (Rev. 4:11b),

4.  He is the King of Energy; because He energized the infinite and eternal universe; God is        light (Psalm 24:10 7 1 Timothy 6:16).

5.  He is the King of Life; because He is “The King eternal, immortal”(1 Timothy 1:17).

6.  He is King of all the Angels; He created the host of heaven (Col.1:16 & Zech. 14:16).

7.  He is the King of all Nations; (John 1:49 & Jeremiah 10:7). 

8.  He is the King of all the Redeemed (Col. 1: 13,14 & Rev. 15:3).


Sadly, in the hearts and minds of many, these days, God is no longer King.


They have rebelled against His authority, refuse His salvation, and even deny His true existence.


But, since He is the Creator of all things, He is indeed the “King of all Creation” - - Sovereign, Master and Ruler, Lord and Judge of all things.


As the pinnacle of His creation, we, His creatures, can only


“acknowledge His authority, trust His wisdom, believe His Word, obey His commandments, receive His grace, accept His free gift of salvation and eternal life, and praise His name!”


The lack of transitional forms in the fossil record has long been a serious problem for the theory of evolution. The discovery of a fossil called Archaeopterix was touted for years as being part reptile and part bird - - therefore “proving” the evolutionary link. It was later proven that Archaeopterix was actually 100 percent bird, and more recently, fossil evidence of modern birds have been found in the so-called “older” rock strata.

Back in about 1975, Yale professor Stephen Jay Gould and his colleagues, determined to overcome this little problem of no transitional forms, proposed a new theory - - a process which they called “Punctuated Equilibrium."

That new theory was quickly accepted by many scientists to be the answer to the lack of evidence of “gradual” change in the fossil record.

Briefly stated, “Punctuated Equilibrium” proposes that existing life forms remained unchanged for millions of years until, as a result of some catastrophe, evolution occurred in rapid spurts and in isolated locations, so rapidly that it left very little or no evidence. That is the reason why there are so many gaps in the fossil record.

In other words, things remained the same for so long there are no fossils showing any noticeable changes - - then, things changed so fast over a short period of time, that we missed it! The problem is, no genetic mechanism can be found to explain how it happened - - and the gaps in the fossil record are too ordered to statistically fit such a theoretical process.

The Bible tells us that “all flesh is not the same, but there is one kind of flesh of man, another flesh of animals, another of fish, and another of birds” (1 Corinthians 15:39). God created each kind separately during the six-day creation week and that is the reason they appear abruptly and fully formed in the fossil record.

However, the Bible also tells us that in the last days, “scoffers” will be “willingly ignorant” of what God has told us in His written Word (2 Peter 3:5). We might do well to remember what the late professor Gould himself wrote in 1977, in the journal Paleobiology, Vol.3 (1), Pg. 34; “Paleontologists (and evolutionary biologists in general) are famous for their facility in devising plausible stories; but they often forget that plausible stories need not be true.”

                    The truth of gensis

“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1). As we can see from this very first verse of the Bible, God created the earth “at the beginning”. This certainly can’t be construed, in any sense, to be an evolutionary statement.

The evolution world-view, however, demands that we believe that the earth didn’t appear at the beginning at all - - but instead, that it came into existence more than half-way down the track of time. The theory of evolution proposes that the universe has existed for billions of years, with a slow emergence of stars - - until our sun appeared.

The next hypothesized event in the alleged evolutionary progression is that a molten blob shot out from the sun, and after millions of years cooled down enough to become a habitable planet. Then the long story of evolution began. But, by this time we are already billions of years beyond the beginning!

Genesis, on the other hand, doesn’t say anything about a molten-hot earth, or a frozen one. Instead, it describes a cool, water-covered earth, ready for God to form the “solid stuff”, right at the start. By the first day (evening and morning) God had created time and what we call “matter” - - not to mention energy in the form of light.

The message of Genesis chapter 1 is clear - - God made the earth at the beginning - - even before some of the “solid parts” of the universe (Genesis 1:14-16). Be assured, God knew what He was doing, and He knew that it would be unreasonable to create things one by one over billions of years - - things which would depend on each other for survival.

Some seem to overlook the fact that many things on earth and in space “interlock together”. In living things, this connection is known as symbiosis - - but even in non-living matter, several of the “bits” can’t exist without other “bits”.

There was indeed a beginning. Not the beginning of God, but the beginning of time and of this world. The universe was no accident, although evolution and some Eastern religions suggest so. Even some who believe in God, and believe He was there in the beginning, attempt to fit Him into an evolutionary framework of millions or billions of years. Such a view, however, cannot be reconciled with the truth of Genesis.


The word “Gospel”, as we all know, means Good News or Good Tidings. Originally, the noun form of Gospel, the Greek word euangelion, meant the reward offered to a messenger who brought news of a victory in battle or escape from danger. In the New Testament, it’s not just news, but Good News - - and denotes the message of Christ, the Good News of the Kingdom of God and of salvation through Christ by faith, on the basis of His substitutionary death, burial, resurrection, and ascension.

The word Gospel, or its correlative words, is found 105 times in the New Testament. The central scripture (with 52 before and 52 after) is 1 Corinthians 15:1 - - which begins the description of the central focus of the New Testament. (see 1 Cor. 15:1-4).

It’s interesting to note that the first time the word Gospel is used, is in Matthew 4:23 - - which tells us that Jesus preached the Gospel of the coming Kingdom of God - - the consummation of His purpose. The last time the word is used is in Revelation 14:6, where the angel flying in the midst of heaven has the “everlasting Gospel” to preach to those on earth, calling them to come and worship Him who made heaven and earth .... (Rev. 14:6-7). So - - the first use of the word Gospel looks forward to the coming of God’s Kingdom, and the last time it’s used looks back to creation.

The Good News, or Gospel of Christ, therefore, is that Jesus is Creator, Savior (Redeemer), and soon coming King. When the Gospel is preached, all of it should be preached - - from Alpha to Omega; from the creation of all things to the consummation of all things.

The late Dr. Henry Morris, founder of the Institute for Creation Research in San Diego, probably said it best: “A Gospel without a creation has no foundation - - a Gospel without a consummation has no hope - - and a Gospel without the cross and empty tomb has no power. So the whole Gospel is based upon a sure foundation, a blessed hope, and all power in heaven and earth."


“Therefore, the Lord Himself will give you a sign. Behold, a virgin will conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel” (Isaiah 7:14).

The one basic fact that makes Jesus’ birth different from any other in history is that He was born of a virgin. For centuries, this virgin birth (or more specifically, the conception by a virgin) has been laughed at, refuted, and attacked - - and at one time or another most people have probably wondered: “Why a virgin birth, anyway?”

The answer is - - if it were not so, God’s plan of redemption would never have been complete. Jesus had to be born of a virgin in order for Him to be without sin - - without the blood of fallen man flowing in His veins. To have authority in the earth, He had to have a physical body, so He had to be born of a woman. But to have authority with heaven, He had to be pure in Spirit - - one with the Father.

Every person born after Adam sinned, has been born in sin - - with a sin nature. But Jesus did not have an earthly father, and this is what makes being “born of a virgin” a must!

Medical science once thought that the mother furnished the blood for the baby in the womb, but for some time now it has been known that this isn’t true. Under normal circumstances, blood doesn’t pass from the mother to the baby. The blood type and chemistry is determined by the father.

As we know, the life of the flesh is in the blood, but because of Adam’s sin and the fall of man, the death of the flesh is also in the blood. Therefore, if Jesus had an earthly father, He would have had death in His blood like we do.

So, thankfully, the conception of Jesus was indeed a supernatural act. God created the first cellforthebodyofJesus. TheHolySpiritover-shadowedMaryand,bythepowerofGod,a seed - - “a Holy thing” - - was planted in her womb. The embryo within her was the Word of God (John 1: 1, 14). It had to be this way, because to redeem mankind that was under the law (Gal. 4:5), the Son Himself had to be “without blemish and without spot” (1 Peter 1:19).

Justas Adam was specially made by God, the “last Adam” was a special creation. Jesus, as the “last Adam”, had to be like the first Adam before the fall. He had to pass the same test that Adam failed. The ultimate sacrifice had to be a perfect man - - in right standing with the Father - - to restore mankind to its rightful position in God’s eyes. A most significant event!


The Old Testament contains several hundred references and some 60 direct prophecies concerning the coming Messiah - - all of which, of course, were fulfilled in the Lord Jesus Christ.

For example:

1)The Messiah was to come from the seed of Abraham; 2) He would come through the line of Isaac (Genesis 21:12) - - which eliminates one-half of the lineage of Abraham; 3) He would be of the line of Jacob (Num. 24:17) - - which eliminates one-half of the lineage of Isaac; 4) He would come from the tribe of Judah (Gen.49:10) - - which now eliminates eleven-twelfths of the tribes of Israel; 5) He would come from the family of Jesse, namely the house of David (Isa. 11:1) - - which eliminates all of Jesse’s sons except David; 6) He would be born in the town of Bethlehem (Micah 5:2) - - which eliminates all the cities of the world except one; 7) and the “clincher”, He would be conceived and born of a virgin (Isa. 7:14).

Other prophetic statements concerning the Messiah include: He would receive gifts from the Magi; He would come out of Egypt; He would be known as a Nazarene; He would be preceded by a messenger (John The Baptist); He would receive special anointing of the Holy Spirit (Christ means Anointed One); He would begin His ministry in Galilee; He would enter Jerusalem on a donkey; He would be sold for 30 pieces of silver; He would be crucified between two thieves; He would be buried in a rich man’s grave; He would be resurrected on the third day and ascend into heaven; etc.

These and other Old Testament declarations establish a solid confirmation of Jesus’ credentials as Messiah, and that He alone could be that “Babe in the Manger”. In fact, scholars have determined that the probability of a single person fulfilling all of the Old Testament prophecies is only one chance in 10 to the 127th power! We can, therefore, be confident in the fact that Jesus is indeed exactly who He says He is!


The context of the Hebrew language used in Genesis Chapter 1 assures us that God created everything in six literal 24-hour days. The history of the genealogies recorded in Genesis 5 and 11 provide an accurate chronology showing that since the earth was created in the five days before Adam, the earth is probably only about 6,000 years old.

In addition there is abundant scientific evidence that supports the six-day creation world-view rather than the millions of years (from goo to you by way of the zoo) evolutionary world-view.

Why, then, do so many still insist that the earth and universe must be very old because they “look old”? Why, they ask, do they “look old” if they’re not old?

Well, in the beginning, God did not use some form of “Theistic Evolution” in His creation plan. He would not have stirred up some pool of “primordial soup”, or just scattered some seeds or eggs then wait for something to develop and see if it (they) would survive.

The very first thing He did was to create ex nihilo (out of nothing) all the elements comprising the earth, universe, and all that is in them. Along with created matter, God created space and time as we know it (what scientists call the space-time-matter continuum). Then God spoke (created by fiat) all the things recorded in Genesis 1:3-27).

By the end of the creation week, the heavens and the earth had to be a full functioning entity - - complete, mature, and fully functional from the start.

When God formed the land by His hands (Day 3), the soil had to be mature - - containing all the elements necessary for plant growth. Trees were fully-grown mature trees. Fish, birds and land animals were formed mature and ready to “multiply after their kind”. Finally, Adam and Eve, for whom everything had been made, were created as full-grown mature individuals - - capable of multiplying to fill the earth. (They probably didn’t have belly-buttons, though - - because they were not born of a woman as were all who came after them).

Does this mean that God has fooled us with some sort of “divine deception”. Making things look older than they are? Certainly not! Consider this - - We wouldn’t accuse Jesus of “deceiving” the ruler of the feast when He changed water into wine would we? Jesus’ first miracle was a miracle of creation. The “best wine” (John 2:10) was a brand new creation, with no time for aging or fermentation - - it was created fully aged and mature because it involved a sudden supernatural creation of a complex item apart from “natural processes."


It seems like every time the subject of creation vs. evolution is discussed, the questions arise - - “What difference does it make whether one believes the world was created or evolved?”, or, “Can’t one embrace both Christianity and evolution?”

Amazingly, an outspoken evolutionist, writing in the American Atheist magazine in the spring of 1999, presented an excellent answer to these questions - - not intending, of course, to support the creationist world-view.

He wrote (quote): “Christianity is - - must be! - - totally committed to the special creation described in Genesis, and Christianity must fight with its full might against the theory of evolution. And here’s why. In Romans (5:12) we read that sin entered in the world through one man, and through sin, death, and thus death has spread through the whole human race because everyone has sinned”.

“The whole justification of Jesus’ life and death is predicated on the existence of Adam and the forbidden fruit he and Eve ate. Without the original sin, who needs to be redeemed? Without Adam’s fall into sin terminated by death, what purpose is there to Christianity? None. Even a High School student knows enough about evolution to know that nowhere in the evolutionary description of our origins does there appear an Adam or an Eve or a forbidden fruit. Evolution means a development from one form to the next to meet the ever-changing challenges from an ever-changing nature. There is no Fall from a previous state of sublime perfection.”

This opponent of Christianity actually saw through to the real issues, better than many Christians. How important it is, indeed, that we as Christians be consistent in our thinking. We must accept all of the Bible as God’s Word, given through inspiration of His Holy Spirit - - because in it, He says what He means and means what He says.

If Adam and Eve were not real historical figures, then who are our real ancestors? If the Fall was not real, then what is sin? If Adam and Eve were not created just as described in Genesis, then the doctrine of marriage is meaningless; and if the earth is billions of years old, and death, disease and bloodshed existed before sin entered the world, then the entire Gospel is weakened.


Over the years, there have been several “accommodation” or “compromise” theories which seek to allow for an acceptance of the “millions of years” evolutionary scenario in the Genesis record of the Creation presented in the Bible.

The Gap Theory (or Ruin – Reconstruction Theory), for example, postulates that there were eons of time - - when dinosaurs ruled the earth and where there might have been some sort of human-like pre-Adamic race of beings - - between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2. This theory proposes that the Genesis account is actually a re-creation, following the destruction of a pre- Adamic world - - which allegedly happened when Satan was cast out of heaven, resulting in the unformed and void earth described in Genesis 1:2. But wait a minute! We know that Satan wasn’t cast out of heaven until after the creation week described in Genesis Chapter 1, because he was in the garden when God pronounced His creation “very good."

Proponents adhere to this theory by reasoning that since science has apparently “proven” that the earth and universe are billions of years old, the long ages can be pigeonholed and forgotten betweenthefirsttwoversesofGenesiswithoutcompromisingtherestoftheBible. Wrong!

Such a compromise theory contradicts Romans 5:12, by allowing for death and suffering to exist before Adam sinned and therefore eliminates the need for Christ to die on the Cross. And, it would make God’s declaration that His creation was “very good” (Genesis 1:31) a joke - - since His creation would have had to been built on top of the dead remains of the previous world.

In Matthew 19:4 and Mark 10:6 Jesus, referring to Adam and Eve, said that from the beginning of creation God made them male and female, teaching that they were created “in the beginning of creation” - - not after billions of years had passed.

Also, we might ask what was the purpose of creating that alleged pre-Adamic world inhabited by creatures that couldn’t have communication or communion with their Creator? And why is there no mention of the destruction of that world anywhere in Scripture? After all, the Bible devotes more than three whole chapters describing the catastrophe of Noah’s day.


    When Adam and Eve disobeyed God and ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, several events were set in motion.

    First was their feeling of guilt- - which was expressed in two ways, shame and fear. They saw they were naked and were ashamed - - and, in fear, they tried to hide from God.

    Then came condemnation.  The serpent was cursed (Genesis 3:15), Eve was to be subject to pain in childbirth (Genesis 3:16), and the ground was cursed so Adam’s life would involve hardship and toil (Genesis 3:17). 

    And finally, there was separation- - separation of Adam and Eve from their intimate fellowship with their Creator.  They had died spiritually and the process of physical death had begun.  Because of the Fall, sin and death entered into the whole universe - - forcing God to place a curse on His entire creation.  Since that day, “… the whole creation groans and travails until now(Romans 8:22).  But thank God it’s only temporary!

    The curse was reinforced by the expulsion of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden.  Genesis chapter 3, verses 22-24 explains exactly what happened and what had to be done about it;  “Then the Lord God said “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put out his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever” - - therefore the Lord God sent him out of the Garden of Eden to till the ground from which he had been taken.  So He drove out the man; and He placed Cherubim at the east of the Garden of Eden, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to guard the way to the tree of life”.

    Being driven out of the Garden and making death the penalty for sin, actually provided a future blessing for us.  If Adam and Eve had remained in the Garden they could have eaten from the tree of life and mankind would have been immortal.  We then, would all be cut off from God forever! However, if we repent and have faith in Christ’s work on the cross for us, physical death brings us into the presence of God in heaven to be with Him for eternity.

    So, death was the ultimate penalty for sin and the very means by which believers are restored to God and, in His eyes, perfection.  And as a bonus, the Bible assures us that in heaven there is no more curse and  “the tree of life is in the midst of the Paradise of God” and is available once again (Revelation 2:7 and 22:2-3).



“And so it is written, the first man Adam became a living being. The last Adam became a life- giving spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45, NKJV). Here, as in Romans 5:12-19, the Apostle Paul shows Adam to be a contrasting type of Christ - - and the Holy Spirit instructs him to give Jesus the title “the Last Adam” (not the second Adam). Have you ever wondered what this title means?

First Adam, Last Adam - - we know that both are vital to the Gospel; but to understand exactly how, we should examine just a few similarities (and differences) between Adam and Jesus. Back in 2002, Dan Lietha of Answers in Genesis Ministries put it simply - - 1) Adam was created, Jesus is the Creator; 2) Man wanted to be like God, God became a man; 3) Adam believed a lie, Jesus is the truth; 4) Adam disobeyed, Jesus obeyed; 5) Adam brought death to the living, Jesus brought life to the dying; 6) Adam was sent away, Jesus was sent to pay.

But let’s look at it in a little more detail. At the beginning, Adam went through a period of testing (the forbidden fruit). At the beginning or His ministry, Jesus was tested (tempted) by Satan in the wilderness (Matthew 4:1-11). Adam failed the test. Jesus was victorious over sin, the flesh and the devil.

It can also be said that both were rulers and givers of life - - Adam was given dominion over the created world, but gave it away. Jesus, after His resurrection, was elevated to sit at the right hand of God and given dominion over all things; which were put “under His feet” (Ephesians 1:20-22). While Adam gave life to his descendants, Jesus gives eternal life to those who will receive Him and believe on His name. He is the way, the truth and the life.

Adam was the head of the human race. Jesus is the head of redeemed humanity. Since Christ died once for all time, there will never be the need for any further “Adam” - - therefore, Jesus is the last Adam.

Remember, we are all connected with the first Adam as we were born with a sin nature - - and are therefore included in the sentence of death. But the Good News is that all who are connected with the Last Adam --Jesus -- through repentance and faith in His redeeming work, are forgiven and so “have passed from death unto life” (1 John 3:14; Romans 5:17; Colossians 1:14).


Speaking as a wildlife biologist (retired) - - When we look at God’s creation (especially the various species of wildlife), we are “without excuse” (Romans 1:20) if we choose to deny that the genetic code in each created kind was programmed by their Creator complete, fully developed and functioning, right from the beginning.

Dr. Michael Behe, Professor of Biochemistry at Lehigh University (and not a supporter of creationism), has pointed out in his book Darwin’s Black Box that there are certain biochemical systems “so complex as to provide what appears to be an insurmountable problem for evolution”.

To see excellent examples of complex biochemical systems, we need to look no further than our own bodies - - the extremely complex pinnacle of God’s creation.

Take blood clotting for example. When we get a cut, we bleed - - until a blood clot forms to stop the bleeding (hopefully within seconds!). Blood clotting is a multi-step process involving numerous enzymes and proteins. If any one of the proteins were missing, the blood would not clot - - and, simply put, each protein depends upon an enzyme to activate it.

We all have heard the old question; “which came first, the chicken or the egg?” The answer is, of course, the chicken - - created fully mature and ready to lay an egg. But when considering the biochemical activity present in blood clotting, some might be tempted to ask; “which came first, the protein or the enzyme?”

Well, it couldn’t be the protein because the protein can’t function without the enzyme to “turn it on”. But then, why would nature “evolve” an activating enzyme before there was anything to activate?

Furthermore, if blood clotting had evolved step-by-step over any extended period of time, creatures would have bled to death long before it was perfected.

No biochemical system, especially as seen in the example of blood clotting, could be the result of some random evolutionary process. Such systems require every component to be working to be functional. If any one component were missing, it would be non-functional.

Therefore, logic and scientific data would tell us that the Genesis account of origins is the only true and acceptable explanation. God created all things mature and fully-functional - - in the beginning!


About 20 years ago, in an article in Discover Magazine, Matthew Cartmill used the term “holy war” to describe any modern day campaign against Darwinian evolution. In his opinion, “No intelligent, reasonable person could possibly have doubts about evolution purely from a scientific view."

The article actually began with the declaration: “As far as we can tell, all of Earth’s living things are descended from a distant common ancestor that lived more than three billion years ago”. “Darwin’s theory”, he added, “has been accepted wisdom for more than a hundred years”. (Emphasis added).

Accepted wisdom! This sounds like peer pressure on steroids! If only Copernicus and Galileo had listened to the “accepted wisdom” of their day, today’s astronomers wouldn’t be dealing with the confusing sun-centered view of our solar system.

In short, Mr. Cartmill believed that most opposition to Darwin’s theory comes from angry, ignorant, conservative, anti-science, Christian fanatics - - along with a few of the uninformed multi-cultural left and that this “sad situation” goes all the way back to 1859, when Darwin published his The Origin of Species. But wait a minute! The fact is that in those days it was the scientists who did not believe Darwin while many “religious” leaders thought he was the greatest thing since the wheel. (now that’s a truly “sad situation”).

Scientists such as Kelvin, Herschel, Agassiz, Mendel, Dana, Maxwell, and Pasteur were extremely opposed to, and openly aligned against Darwin. Adam Sedgewick, the man who taught Darwin the elements of field geology, wrote to Darwin after reading The Origin of Species and told him: “I have read your book with more pain than pleasure, ... parts of which I read with absolute sorrow, because I think them utterly false and mischievous”. Darwin’s book was actually banned from the library at Cambridge.

While scientists were lining up against Darwin, many religious leaders were applauding him and cheering him on “as if he were preaching the Gospel." Rev. Josiah Strong, in his pamphlet America’s Destiny, wrote that scripture and evolution can go “hand-in-hand." Others, including Henry Drummond, James Orr, and Henry Ward Beecher, declared that evolution was “a valid idea whose time had come."

When Darwin died, accolades poured in from the churches. When he was buried in Westminster Abbey, it was said that “the Abbey did not bestow dignity on the naturalist as his body was hallowed already”.

It seems like we may be coming full circle concerning the acceptance of Darwin’s evolutionary theory. An increasing number of scientists today are acknowledging that evolution is not a valid, or proven, theory of origins - - while, sadly, many Christian leaders are accepting evolutionary ideas through the various “compromise theories”, such as the Gap Theory, Theistic Evolution, the Day-Age Theory, Intelligent Design, etc...

As believers, we must hold fast to the foundational book of Genesis and its foundation of Creation. As Psalm 11:3 tells us; “If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?”


It’s been said before, but it deserves repeating, the truth of the entire Bible stands or falls with the historicity of Genesis. Ironically, the secular world recognizes this more than many in the church.

In fact, Thomas Huxley, one of the 19th century’s most ardent proponents of the theory of evolution, chided Christians in his essay on “Science and the Hebrew Tradition” when he wrote: “I am fairly at a loss to comprehend how anyone for a moment can doubt that Christian theology must stand or fall with the historical trustworthiness of the Jewish Scriptures. The identification of Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah rests upon the interpretation of the passages of Hebrew Scriptures, which have no evidential value unless they possess the historical character assigned to them”.

Some in the church today hold the view that the first eleven chapters of Genesis are merely allegorical and poetic expressions which are open to various interpretations - - even allowing for evolution as an explanation for the origin of the universe and man.

But, as a child once remarked “If God didn’t mean what He said, why didn’t He say what He meant?” Well, the good news is - - He did say what He meant!

We are not dealing with poetry in Genesis 1 through 11, but the blow by blow account of a series of major events which are entirely accurate and vital to the acceptance of the rest of Scripture, and of Jesus Christ as Creator, Savior and Lord.

So, why should we take Genesis 1 – 11 as literal history? First, and foremost, Jesus regarded the major characters and events as true history. He referred to Adam and Eve indirectly in Matthew 19:4; to Abel directly in Matthew 23:35 and Luke 11:51; and to Noah and the Flood directly in Matthew 24:37-39 and Luke 17:26-27.

The genealogy of Christ in Luke chapter 3 supports the genealogies of Genesis 5 and11, and also that of 1 Chronicles 1. Repetition like this should support the view that the genealogies represent an accurate history of the ancestry of man.

Also, the Apostles regarded the major characters and events of Genesis 1 – 11 as accurate history as well. Paul refers to Adam and Eve as real persons in Romans 5:14; 1 Cor.15:32, 35; 2 Cor. 11:3 and 1 Timothy 2:13, 14. If Genesis is not true history, then 1 Timothy 2 becomes nonsense.

Hebrews 11:4 and 12:24 refer to Cain and Abel as historical, and both John and Jude confirm this in John 3:12 and Jude 11. Jude 14 also speaks of the genealogy from Adam to Enoch as true history - - saying Enoch was “the seventh from Adam”.

Then, Peter refers to Noah historically in both Epistles (1 Peter 3:20 and 2 Peter 2:5). Peter also considered the Flood as a true historical event in 1 Peter 2:5 and especially in 2 Peter 3:4-7.

It’s probably safe to say that Christians believe without question that the words of Jesus and the Apostles are inspired and true. Then, from just these few examples we must conclude that the New Testament leaves no doubt that Adam and Eve were indeed historical, with their ensuing fall; that the genealogy from Adam to Noah is historical; and that the Flood was a worldwide historical event - - just as Genesis records.


At the end of the 6th day of the Creation Week, God looked at all He had made and declared it “Very Good” (Genesis 1:31). But, by only the 10th generation from Adam the human race had become so evil, wicked, violent, and corrupt, that God had no choice but to judge His creation.

Genesis chapter 6, verses 5, 11 and 12, gives 4 reasons why God sent the worldwide Flood: 1) “The wickedness of man was great in the earth”; 2) “Every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually”; 3) “The earth was filled with violence”; 4) “The earth ....was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth”. - - that is, taken in the context of the Hebrew writing, all the people had corrupted their way.

These four types of iniquity that were prevalent in Noah’s day, have become a way of life for many in today’s world. But we should not be surprised! After all, when people are taught from kindergarten to adulthood - - through every branch of the media and much of the education system - - that the world made itself (and therefore God is unnecessary or does not exist), and that they are nothing more than highly evolved animals, it is to be expected that they would give themselves over to these sorts of behavior.

As a result, the Ten Commandments have become just “ten suggestions”, abstinence is regarded as “neurotic inhibition”, perversion is “an alternative life style”, and the only absolute left in society is that there are no absolutes.

Jesus said: “As the days of Noah were, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be” (Matthew 24:37). Therefore, the warnings given to Noah’s generation are very relevant for us.

However, there is one important thing to remember, and thank God for, about the Flood and Noah. God’s mercy regarding the Flood is just as evident as His judgement - - and is seen in the fact that God provided a way of escape for those who were prepared to believe what He had said, heed the warnings He gave, and take advantage of the means of salvation which He provided by instructing Noah to build an Ark.

Noah and his family were the only people in that day that believed God, and only those eight people boarded the Ark “in faith” and were saved.

Just as in the days of Noah, God has given us warning of the judgement to come (Isaiah 34:4; Micah 1:4; 1 Thess. 5:2; 2 Peter 3:10; Rev. 3:3); and He has provided the way of salvation (Acts 4:12; Romans 10:9, 10).

For Noah, the Ark was the only refuge from divine judgement, and it had to be entered by faith. For us, this speaks of the Lord Jesus Christ, the only Savior and Ark of refuge for fallen mankind - - whose sacrificial death on the Cross, for all, must be appropriated by faith. When we believe in our heart that Jesus IS LORD and God has raised Him from the dead, we have assurance that we can enter into the rest and safety of our Ark, Jesus, when He returns to complete His work of redemption and reconciliation.


When we think we’ve got problems confronting us - - consider the problems that Moses and the Israelites faced in their Exodus from Egypt. We received an e-mail a while back that described the Exodus something like this:

Moses led some 2 to 3 million people into the wilderness - - but what was he going to do with them? They were going to require a lot of food and supplies.

According to a former Army Quartermaster General, they would need about 1,500 tons of food each day. To bring that much food each day, two freight trains at least a mile long would be required (try to convert that to camels or donkeys if you wish).

Then, it should be remembered that they were in a desert, so firewood would be needed for cooking. This would take about 4,000 tons of wood and a few more freight trains (caravans), each a mile long, for just one day.

And don’t forget about water! A minimum of about 11 million gallons would be needed each day - - and a train of tank cars, hundreds of miles long, to deliver it.

Of course, we also know that a unique problem arose shortly after the people headed east - - they had to cross the Red Sea (actually a branch of the Red Sea known as the Gulf of Aqaba). If they went on a narrow path, double file, the line would be about 800 miles long and would require 35 days and nights to get through. So, there had to be a space about 3 miles wide to walk on so they could walk 5,000 abreast to get across in one night.

SIDE NOTE: skeptics usually attempt to downplay this miracle by saying that they crossed the edge of a “Red Sea” - - where the water was only a few inches deep. Well, even if this were true, it would be a great miracle to see the Egyptian Army, many on chariots, drown along with the horses and foot soldiers, in just a few inches of water!

Anyway, back to the facts - - where another problem arose. Each time they camped at the end of the day, a campsite two-thirds the size of Rhode Island was required.

Do you think Moses had this all figured out before he left Egypt? Probably not. Moses believed in God and trusted Him to take care of these things - - AND HE DID!

Some of the problems we face might seem insurmountable to us, but they pale in significance when compared to the Exodus - - so would God have any problem taking care of all our needs? No, nothing is too difficult for Him.

So when trials and troubles come our way (and they will) we can be confident that His promises are true and He will see us through. We are His special creation and He is our awesome God - - and He will work on our behalf, if we just trust and obey, humble ourselves and pray, and seek His face (2 Chronicles 7:14).


    Racially motivated hate crimes seem to be making headlines far too often these days.  But one point should be made clear, so there can be no misunderstanding - - the concept of “race” is not Biblical!  There is no mention of races, as such, in Scripture - - nor is there any theological meaning to the term.

    Therefore, it must be concluded that races are arbitrary entities invented by man for his own convenience and anthropological studies.  Actually, as Dr. Henry M. Morris once wrote, the term “race” is strictly an evolutionary concept used by Darwin, Huxley, and others in the 19th century “to rationalize their white racism”. 

    So, then, what does the Bible say?  The testimony of the Bible is that all men who have ever lived are descendants of Adam and are of essentially the same race - - the human race.  While the Bible does not mention races, it does have a lot to say about nations and languages.  “And God has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth…” (Acts 17:36).  This distinction of “nations” is even in heaven, as Revelation 7:9 gives the vision of  “a great multitude which no one could number; of all nations, tribes, peoples, and tongues …”.

    After the “confounding of their language” at the tower of Babel, and the dispersion of people away from the area of Mesopotamia, miraculous physiological changes must have occurred in the centers of the peoples brains that control speech.   The resulting confusion and incoherent arguments finally led each family to go its own way and establish its own national and linguistic identity.

    A certain amount of isolation and national inbreeding was genetically essential for the development of national “traits”.   National characteristics would have developed rapidly, because different innate genetic factors for skin color, stature, hair texture, etc., were originally created in Adam and Eve to permit development of different family characteristics as the human race would multiply and fill the earth (Gen.1:28; 9:1).  These characteristics, however, are superficial and could never result in a new “kind” of man.

    The bottom line is, all “nations” are alike before God in that they all need a Savior, and in that all can come to the Savior, Jesus Christ, if they will.  (see Galatians 3:26-29; and, of course,  John 3:16).


We often hear the claim made by some evolutionists that evolution is “science”, while Creation is “religion”. But have you ever wondered why evolutionists keep holding on to a theory that was never “proved” in the first place - - and has been repeatedly disproved over the past few decades by advanced scientific research?

Believe it or not, most evolutionists and scientists freely admit that evolution is a religion - - a non-theistic religion. For example: Back in the 1950’s, Dr. C. Loren Eisley stated that science has been “left in the somewhat embarrassing position of having to postulate theories of living organisms which it could not demonstrate. After having chided the theologian for his reliance on myth and miracle, science found itself in the inevitable position of having to create a mythology of its own - - namely, the assumption that what, after long effort could not prove to take place today had, in truth, taken place in the primeval past”.

In 1980, Physicist H.S. Lipson wrote in Physics Bulletin Vol. 31 that; “Subsequent to the publication of Darwin’s book The Origin Of Speciesevolution became, in a sense, a scientific religion - - almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to “bend” their observations to fit with it”.

Dr. L.H. Matthews, in the introduction to a later edition of Darwin’s book, stated; “The fact of evolution is the back-bone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory - - is it then a science or faith?

Even the Encyclopedia Britannica (Origin and Evolution of the Universe) observed that evolution is; “the mythological element in a philosophy that functions as a virtual religion”.

Then there’s the mathematical Law of Probability, which shows that life arising and “evolving” by chance is a mathematical impossibility. Back in 1981, British astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle and his colleague Chandra Wickramasinghe (both evolutionists and avowed atheists) calculated the odds against the chance formation of life on earth. They determined that the chance formation of just one protein, with the proper sequence of amino acids, was one chance in 10 to the 260th power. 

The probability of chance formation of life as we know it was less than one in 10 to the 40,000th power!

It’s obvious, then, that accepting evolution as fact requires a tremendous amount of faith - - faith in experiments that prove nothing, except the need for intelligence in the beginning.



“...Jesus Christ, who being in the form of God coming in the likeness of man, And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death on the cross” (Philippians 2:5-8).

But praise God, He rose again just as He said He would (Mark 9:9, John 2:19) - - and ascended to the right hand of the Father where He ever makes intercession for us (Ephesians 1:20, Romans 8:24).

Now there are many who do not believe the historical eyewitness accounts that Jesus really died and rose again, and they have devised many stories in an attempt to explain away the Empty Tomb.

Some have suggested that the disciples stole Jesus’ body and then lied, saying that He rose from the dead. But - - the disciples couldn’t have even made it to the tomb without being noticed by the Roman guards. Then there’s the fact that most of the disciples died for their belief that Jesus rose from the dead. They would not have died for something they knew to be a lie!

Others say that the story of the resurrection is just a myth or a legend. But the Gospels were written between 25 and 65 years after the event - - hardly enough time for a legend or myth to develop. Some of the eyewitnesses to the event were still around to answer any questions.

Some critics say the Jesus simply fainted on the cross (the so-called “Swoon Theory”) and then revived in the cool tomb and got up and left. But - - Jesus would have had to somehow unwrap Himself from the grave clothes, push aside the large stone (which was so heavy that it took several men to place it there), and then walk past the Roman guards outside. Could an almost-dead-by-crucifixion man have the strength to do this? Also, a Roman soldier had pierced Jesus’ side with a spear while He was still on the cross, and the blood and water that flowed from the wound showed that He was truly dead.

Still others have said that the Roman soldiers or other Jews removed Jesus’ body from the tomb. But those people had no reason to do that - - instead, they would have wanted to keep the body in the tomb to stop any stories that Jesus had actually risen. If the disciples would say He had been seen alive, the soldiers could easily prove the story false by producing the body.

Yes, Jesus did die a terrible death on the cross, for you and for me - - but Jesus, the creator of all things, was not defeated by death. He rose again in three days, showing that He had power overall things including death, hell, and the grave. The bodily resurrection of our Savior and Lord Jesus from the dead is the crowning proof of Christianity - - the final evidence that He paid the price for our redemption and that His sacrifice, that covered every area of man’s existence, was wholly accepted by God the Father.


It probably goes without saying, but the fact is - - the Christian life hinges on the reality of the resurrection of Jesus. If the resurrection is not a fact, then, as the Apostle Paul said; “our preaching is in vain and your faith is also in vain” (1 Corinthians 15:14). “Vain” means, of course; empty, powerless, and of no effect.

But Jesus did rise from the dead, and as a fact of history, He appeared to hundreds of people in the 40 days following the crucifixion - - even to 500 at one time (1 Cor., Chapter 15). Jesus also appeared to John on the Isle of Patmos and proclaimed: “I am He that liveth, and was dead: and behold, I am alive forevermore, Amen, and have the keys of hell and of death” (Revelation 1:18 KJV).

Jesus’ death and resurrection, in a manner of speaking, “undid” what Adam’s sin did back in the Garden of Eden. Adam’s sin had caused separation from God. Jesus’ death and resurrection paid the penalty for sin (in full - - once and for all) and opened the door to fellowship with God.

Jesus’ suffering entailed more than being nailed to the cross. Around 700 B.C. the prophet Isaiah made known the purpose of the cross of the coming Messiah. “Surely He has borne our griefs, And carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed Him stricken, Smitten by God and afflicted. He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement for our peace was upon Him, and by His stripes we are healed” (Isaiah 53:4,5).

Those words “sorrows” and “griefs” also mean “infirmities” and “sicknesses” (Matthew 8:17). Jesus’ sacrifice covered every area of man’s existence. Suffering in our place and being separated from the Father, Jesus suffered spiritual torment, mental distress and physical pain.

But Praise God! - - as a result, Jesus defeated Satan and gained victory over death, hell, and the grave. Then, when Divine justice was satisfied, God raised Him from the dead and He ascended into heaven - - where He is now seated at God’s right hand, making intercession for us.

Christ’s resurrection, then, was the final evidence that He had paid the price for our redemption - - that His sacrifice for us was accepted by God the Father, and that we could have eternal life and be forever reconciled to God as a result.

Because Jesus took on human form and became obedient unto death on a cross, and rose from the dead, we can have the free gift of eternal life with Him. But remember, a gift is only a gift if it is accepted. He gave all that He had so that we might have everything we need.

This is the Blessed Hope we have through our Risen Lord!


“The fear of the Lord is the beginning or wisdom; and the knowledge of the Holy One is understanding” (Proverbs 9:10).

There is an enormous amount of propaganda being circulated these days, emanating from the highest circles of establishment science and education, that suggests that Biblical Christian faith is either antagonistic to science or is at least irrelevant to it.

The most popular mantra, expressed by some who have been unable to successfully refute the facts of the Creation Model of origins, is that creationists are “anti-science” (which is, of course, absolutely untrue). The “establishment” argues, therefore, that science must be taught on a purely naturalistic basis, with no reference whatever to God, or Creation, or to the supernatural.

A Christian is then forced to make a choice - - the “establishment” (not all scientists per se, as many are also Christians), or God. God’s Word makes it plain that “the fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge” (Proverbs 1:7). It is understood, of course, that this word “fear” means “reverential trust, profound awe, and intense awareness of God’s absolute Holiness” - - and that “wisdom” is usually defined as “knowledge guided by understanding”

The New Testament notes that in Christ “are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:3). Since Jesus is the incarnate Word of God, and “Without Him was not anything made that was made” (John 1:3), it is necessarily true that true science must be built on the knowledge of Him who created the world and the universe that scientists seek to study.

This is why science itself could only have developed - - as indeed the leading historians of science recognize it did - - in the context of the Christian worldview. Nearly all the founding fathers of modern science (Kepler, Newton, da Vinci, Linnaeus, Boyle, Pascal, Pasteur, Faraday, Kelvin, etc.) were men who believed in God, special creation and the Bible. They conducted their scientific research and inquiry with the motivation that they were merely “thinking God’s thoughts after Him”.

But when scientists try to eliminate God from His creation, using the evolutionary humanist philosophy as an explanation for the origin and history of our world, they are not building up science, but “science falsely so called” (1 Timothy 6:20). True science always supports the Scriptures.

As Dr. Werner von Braun, father of our space program, once said: “Looking at the vast mysteries of the universe should only confirm our belief in the certainty of its Creator”.


It was back in the 1930’s, when a well-known researcher stated at a conference of leading scientists of the day, that there was nothing significant left to discover. (this was shortly before the invention of the atomic bomb, the transistor, and the laser).

But even after all of the scientific advances in the last few decades, life itself seems to be the “final frontier” for many branches of science.

The book, “Biology and the Future of Man”, contains the following declaration: “Indeed, only two major questions remain shrouded in the cloak of not-quite fathomable mystery: 1. the origin of life (the events that first gave rise to remarkable cooperative functioning of nucleic acids and proteins), and 2. The mind-body problem (the physical basis for self-awareness and personality). Great strides have been made in the approaches to both of these problems, but the ultimate explanations are perceived very dimly indeed.”

So, what options do we have? There are really only two. Depending upon our premises, presuppositions, and biases, everything comes down to one of two alternatives: 1) “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1), or 2) “Once upon a time, billions of years ago, under a deadly sun, in an ammoniated ocean topped by a poisonous atmosphere, in the midst of a soup of organic molecules, a nucleic acid molecule came accidentally into being that could somehow bring about the existence of another like itself”.

Two choices. Take your pick. Pick the first and you will see all natural history as divinely guided by a pre-existent creator toward the pinnacle of His creation, Mankind, with whom He could have fellowship. Pick the second, that mankind is the product of a cosmic roll of the dice, and that time, chance and matter added up to an impersonal man and universe, and you are left with no God, heaven or hell - - or for that matter, any confidence in humanity and its future.

These two options have significant implications for the way we view ourselves and others. Both sides have their authorities, creeds and prophets, and in the final analysis, both are matters of faith. But the real question is, “which one has the facts going for it?”.

By the way - - have you ever thought it strange that a brilliant researcher would spend 30 or 40 years of his or her life in a laboratory trying to create or duplicate life, to prove that no “intelligence” was necessary to form it in the beginning?


Back in the 1980’s, when the term “politically correct” became popular, it soon became obvious, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that any professing Christian - - and especially a creationist - - was quite “politically incorrect”.

Many had hoped that this trend would be rejected by the so-called “open-minded” advocates of academic freedom. Wrong! Almost overnight, political correctness was accepted and defended by many leaders in academics, politics, the media, and yes, even by some church leaders.

Today, many thought systems are labeled “politically incorrect”. But why does belief in the Genesis account of creation and the Flood seem to be at the top of the list? There are probably many reasons, but the primary reason is that evolution is the foundation for most thought systems now deemed “correct” - - from humanism, to new age, to post-modernism (a term I don’t even pretend to understand).

But evolution can’t stand the test of open scientific inquiry. Therefore, the Biblical account of special creation and a world-wide Flood must be ridiculed - - even censored. It follows then, that in the name of “tolerance”, the PC crowd belittles and maligns any person or thought that is not, in their view, “tolerant” - - that is, which does not value every viewpoint or action as being equally valid.

Christianity, through its foundational message of Special Creation, insists that absolute truth does exist, in faith and practice as well as science and history. The intolerant “Politically Correct” movement against the truth of God’s Word seems to gather momentum each year, especially in the schools and universities - - and unprepared Christian students often fall prey to the concepts of the evolutionary world-view.

If standing for what God is for, and against what God is against, is considered by some as being “intolerant” - - intolerant of those views and actions that exalt the words and thoughts of fallible man over those of the Creator God - - so be it!

Actually, I hate to say it, but we could be called something even beyond “intolerant” or “politically incorrect” About 20 years ago a survey conducted in the UK showed that only 26 % of those surveyed expressed belief in the God of the Bible. Even among the 103 British church Bishops surveyed, 25 percent no longer believe in the virgin birth and a few admitted they didn’t believe that Jesus rose from the dead.

After reviewing the survey results, a University of Aberdeen sociology professor concluded that “Britain is now a post-Christian society”, and Christians are “a Deviant Minority”. Just being politically incorrect doesn’t sound so bad.


The question is often asked: Why four Gospels? - - Why not one or two? Or even five or six? Consider the following (taken from The Chuck Missler Update, Nov. 2001):
The words of each Gospel were given, of course, by inspiration of the Holy Spirit. However, they were given in a way that would be best understood by each writer - - from his perspective, according to his background. Therefore, each Gospel presents Jesus from a different point of reference.

MATTHEW: A Levite and Tax Collector - - writing to the Jew.
– emphasizes Jesus as Messiah; the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies.
– gives Jesus’ genealogy from Abraham through David to Joseph.
– concludes with the Resurrection.
– focuses on What Jesus Said (as an official, Matthew probably able to record words nearly verbatim).
– records first miracle as the cleansing of the leper (a Jewish metaphor for sin).

MARK: Served as a secretary for Peter - - writing to the Roman. – emphasizes Jesus as the Obedient Servant of God.
– the only Gospel not concerned with Jesus’ genealogy.
– concludes with the Ascension.

– focuses on What Jesus Did.
– records first miracle as casting unclean spirit out of man at synagogue.

LUKE: A Gentile and a doctor - - writing to the Greek.
– emphasizes Jesus as Son Of Man (His humanity).
– gives Jesus’ genealogy from Adam through Abraham to David same as Matthew, but Luke does not go through Solomon - - instead goes through Nathan, to Mary.
– concludes with the promise of the Holy Spirit (A bridge to the Book of Acts).
– focuses on What Jesus Felt.
– records first miracle same as Mark (casting out an unclean spirit).

JOHN: Writing to the Church.
– emphasizes Jesus as the Son Of God.
– gives Jesus’ genealogy as the “Preexistent One”.
– concludes with Jesus’ promise to come again (a bridge to the Book of Revelation).
– focuses on Who Jesus Was.
– records first miracle as the changing water into wine. (also records 7 miracles, 7 discourses, and 7 “I AM” statements).



    “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God”……..”And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us”…. (John 1:1, 14).  These familiar scriptures assure us that Jesus, the second person of the Godhead, the Word, the Creator, set aside His position and came to earth as a man, and lived among us for some 33 years.

    Many have asked the question; “Why?” - - Why did Jesus come down from heaven?    Actually, Jesus Himself gave us several reasons why He came.  For example, in the first, and most significant, reference in the New Testament to this question, Jesus said; “Think not that I have come to destroy the Law or the prophets; I am come not to destroy, but to fulfill” (Matthew 5:17).  He also tells us, “For I came down, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent me”(John 6:38) - - “For the Son of man is come to seek and save that which is lost” (Luke 19:10) - - “I am come not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance” (Luke 5:32) - - and, “I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly” (John 10:10).

    Remember, when Adam and Eve were cast out of the garden, God immediately judged the serpent (Satan).  God said: “Because you have done this, you are cursed more than all cattle, and more than every beast of the field; on your belly you shall go, and you shall eat dust all the days of your life.  And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise your head and you shall bruise His heel” (Genesis 3:14-15). 

    These were the first prophetic words about a coming Messiah (v.15), and they set in motion God’s plan that would bring Jesus (God’s only begotten Son), the seed of the woman, the Redeemer, the Savior of mankind, our hope of glory - - to take upon Himself the form of man.

    NOTE:  Jesus also said:  “For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved (John 3:17).  That word “saved”, sozo (sode-zoe) in the Greek, is interpreted in Strong’s as meaning to “save, heal, cure, preserve, keep safe and sound, rescue from danger or destruction, and deliver”.  Sozo also “saves from physical death by healing, and from spiritual death by forgiving sin and its effects”.    In some cultures Sozois translated simply; “to give new life” and “to cause to have a new heart”    Amen!  



    “Therefore, the Lord Himself will give you a sign.  Behold, a virgin will conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel”  (Isaiah 7:14).

    The one basic fact that makes Jesus’ birth different from any other in history is that He was born of a virgin.   For centuries, this virgin birth (or more specifically, the conception by a virgin) has been laughed at, refuted, and attacked - - and at one time or another most people have probably wondered:  “Why a virgin birth, anyway?”

    The answer is - - if it were not so, God’s plan of redemption would never have been complete.  Jesus had to be born of a virgin in order for Him to be without sin - - without the blood of fallen man flowing in His veins.  To have authority in the earth, He had to have a physical body, so He had to be born of a woman.  But to have authority with heaven, He had to be pure in Spirit - - one with the Father.

    Every person born after Adam sinned, has been born in sin - - with a sin nature.  But Jesus did not have an earthly father, and this is what makes being  “born of a virgin” a must!

    Medical science once thought that the mother furnished the blood for the baby in the womb, but for some time now it has been known that this isn’t true.  Under normal circumstances, blood doesn’t pass from the mother to the baby.  The blood type and chemistry is determined by the father.

    As we know, the life of the flesh is in the blood, but because of Adam’s sin and the fall of man, the death of the flesh is also in the blood.  Therefore, if Jesus had an earthly father, He would have had death in His blood like we do.

    So, thankfully, the conception of Jesus was indeed a supernatural act.  God created the first cell for the body of Jesus.  The Holy Spirit over-shadowed Mary and, by the power of God, a seed - - “a Holy thing” - - was planted in her womb. The embryo within her was the Word of God (John 1: 1, 14).  It had to be this way, because to redeem mankind that was under the law (Gal. 4:5), the Son Himself had to be “without blemish and without spot” (1 Peter 1:19). 

    Just as Adam was specially made by God, the “last Adam” was a special creation.  Jesus, as the “last Adam”, had to be like the first Adam before the fall.  He had to pass the same test that Adam failed.  The ultimate sacrifice had to be a perfect man - - in right standing with the Father - - to restore mankind to its rightful position in God’s eyes.  A most significant event!





    The Old Testament contains several hundred references and some 60 direct prophecies concerning the coming Messiah - - all of which, of course, were fulfilled in the Lord Jesus Christ.   For example:

1) The Messiah was to come from the seed of Abraham;  2) He would come through the line of Isaac (Genesis 21:12) - - which eliminates one-half of the lineage of Abraham; 3) He would be of the line of Jacob (Num. 24:17) - - which eliminates one-half of the lineage of Isaac;  4) He would come from the tribe of Judah (Gen.49:10) - - which now eliminates eleven-twelfths of the tribes of Israel;  5) He would come from the family of Jesse, namely the house of David (Isa. 11:1) - - which eliminates all of Jesse’s sons except David;  6) He would be born in the town of Bethlehem (Micah 5:2) - - which eliminates all the cities of the world except one;  7) and the “clincher”, He would be conceived and born of a virgin (Isa. 7:14). 

Other prophetic statements concerning the Messiah include:  He would receive gifts from the Magi;  He would come out of Egypt;  He would be known as a Nazarene;  He would be preceded by a messenger (John The Baptist);  He would receive special anointing of the Holy Spirit (Christ means Anointed One);  He would begin His ministry in Galilee;  He would enter Jerusalem on a donkey;  He would be sold for 30 pieces of silver;  He would be crucified between two thieves;  He would be buried in a rich man’s grave;  He would be resurrected on the third day and ascend into heaven;  etc.

These and other Old Testament declarations establish a solid confirmation of Jesus’ credentials as Messiah, and that He alone could be that “Babe in the Manger”.  In fact, scholars have determined that the probability of a single person fulfilling all of the Old Testament prophecies is only one chance in 10 to the 127th power!  We can, therefore, be confident in the fact that Jesus is indeed exactly who He says He is! 




    Just a note to students and tweens who have been fed the lie of evolution throughout your years in school - - you are indeed special in the eyes of the Creator.

    In Matthew19:4 and Mark 10:6, Jesus said: “Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning made them male and female”.   In this statement, referring to Genesis 1:27 as literal history, Jesus presents two important facts.

    First, that He (Jesus) is a creationist - - after all, He is the Creator! (John 1:1-3 & 14 and Colossians 1:16).  Second, it clearly establishes that Adam and Eve were created “at the beginning” (on the sixth day of the creation week) - - not after the earth had already existed for 4 or 5 billion years.

    Humanism (a name that sounds like a system that really “cares” about humanity) is prevalent throughout our society these days - - but it is a belief system based entirely on a foundation of evolution and declares that there is no need for a God.

    The Humanist Manifesto, formulated by the renowned educator John Dewey, was first printed in 1933 and expanded in 1973.  It accepts evolution as a proven scientific fact and makes some amazing “affirmations” - - including: that, “the universe itself is self-existing and not created”, that “faith in God is outmoded and dangerous”, and that “no deity will save us, we must save ourselves”.

     When people accept this doctrine and the belief in a process of evolution from the non-living primordial ooze, to living cells, to animals, to apes, to man - - that is, from goo to you by way of the zoo - - it’s no wonder so many tend to feel worthless; just an “accident” of random chance; without purpose or hope.

    But this is not true!  You were created as a spiritual being, “fearfully and wonderfully made” (Psalm 139:4), and very special to God.   Men and women were made to not only have a body (formed from the “created” earth) and a soul (mind, will and emotions), but especially to possess an eternal spirit capable of communion and fellowship with the Creator.

    The human body was specifically planned to be most suited for this divine fellowship (including an erect posture, and a brain and tongue designed for articulate speech - - none of which are shared by the animals).  The human body was designed in the form in which God had planned from eternity that He Himself would one day assume (1 Peter 1:20).

    You are indeed distinct from the rest of creation, and are worth so much to God the Father that He gave everything He had so that you could have everything you need (see Isaiah chapter 53 and John 3:16).  Through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, He made the way for each one of us to receive the gift of eternal life with Him (see Romans 10: 9-10).



    The Humanist Manifesto of 1933, largely formulated by the renowned educator John Dewey, has only in recent years received the attention from the Christian community that it deserves.  But, for the past 50 years or so, the 15 tenets of the religion of Humanism (yes, it has been declared a religion by the US Supreme Court) have had a profound impact on American schools and society.

    It is surprising, however, that many Christians still do not understand what humanism really is (or isn’t), or what its underlying foundation is based upon.

    At first glance, Humanism may sound like an admirable philosophy - - a concern for humankind and for the improvement of the human condition.  Noah Webster’s original 1828 Dictionary actually describes a humanist as “one well versed in the knowledge of human nature”. Sounds OK so far.

    More recently, the Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary describes Humanism (a word not in use in 1828) as “Human nature, the study of the humanities, an attitude, thought, or action centering upon human interests or ideals”.   Still sound OK?

    But what does Humanism stand for today?  The first two tenets of the Humanist Manifesto are: 1) “Religious Humanists regard the universe as self-originating and not created”, and 2) “Humanism believes that man is part of nature and has emerged as a result of a continuous process”.   This is exactly what evolution teaches!  The belief in a long process of evolution of the universe and mankind is thus acknowledged to be the very foundation of Humanism.

    Then, in 1973, the 2ndHumanist Manifesto reaffirmed and amplified those tenets.   Among other things, the 2ndManifesto proclaimed; “as non-theists, we begin with man, not God - - nature, not deity.  No deity will save us; we must save ourselves”.

    Knowing this, it is then obvious that the term “Humanism” is not really the proper term with which to describe this religion.  Humanism should be called what it really is: HUMANITARIANISM - - which some modern dictionaries define as: “The tenet denying the divinity of Christ; the doctrine that man’s nature is perfectible through his own efforts”.

    The goal of humanism is, therefore, to cast doubt, dissension, compromise, apathy, etc., within the ranks of those who believe the Genesis account of Creation, the Fall and entrance of sin into the creation, judgement through the world-wide Flood, and the need for a Savior.   In other words, the religion of Humanism is concentrating on not only casting doubt upon, but completely destroying, the very foundation of Christianity - - namely, that God’s Word is Truth!